Gap assessments
Each assessment asks one question of the connection between a Priority Area and the subject, answered with a verdict: Not a gap, Moderate, or Severe. The evidence shows where to look. The guiding questions help pin down what is failing and how severely, using other available data and local knowledge.
The typical responses name the class of intervention a gap implies, not a specific project.
Standard first/last mile gap assessments
| Assessment | What it asks | Evidence | Guiding questions | Typical responses |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pedestrian environment | Is the walk inside this area comfortable? | A walk-comfort score for each unit, built from its streets, tree canopy, and paved surface. |
| Shade · streetscape · buffered sidewalk |
| Travel-time competitiveness | Is transit here competitive with the alternatives? | Door-to-door time of the fastest transit trip between the area and the subject, beside the fastest trip by other means. |
| Direct feeder · route restructuring · speed or reliability improvement |
| Transfer burden | How many times must a rider change vehicles to get here? | The number of transfers on the fastest transit trip between the area and the subject. |
| Network restructure · direct feeder |
| Service frequency | How long is the wait in the window that matters? | How often the least frequent route on the fastest transit trip runs. |
| Frequency increase · BRT upgrade |
| Service span | Does service run when this area's objectives need it? | The hours and days each route on the fastest transit trip runs. |
| Span extension |
| Access distance | How far must a rider walk to use transit here? | Total walking on the fastest transit trip: to the first stop, between stops, and from the last stop. |
| Stop siting · path connection · microtransit |